The hardened shell of dubstep
Friday, August 3rd, 2007Rupture pulls together a few interesting strands on the current state of dubstep.
Scene development has to be one of the most frustrating things in existence. The trail from bright and inclusive to hardened shell stifling internal life seems to have become a key feature of music culture in the time I’ve been following it; especially the steps from house to jungle/drum’n'bass to big beat (for anyone who can remember how exciting and all-encompassing that scene was initially) to 2step to dubstep/grime. It’s almost as though the scenes needs the explosion/implosion dynamic to amass the energies required to catalyse these musical leaps. Or is it just a generational thing, from bright and excited to jaded and functional?
Rupture quotes a Kevin Martin/The Bug interview:
Because for me the beauty of dubstep were the producers that I met in the beginning, the fact that they were influenced by a lot of different music; Kode 9, Mala, influenced by jungle, influenced by dub, influenced by classical music, soundtrack music. That’s brilliant, I could hear that on the tracks but now i think that there are new producers that are coming into dubstep and they only listen to dubstep and for me that’s when jungle became drum n bass, that was the problem then.
Talking about the differences between dubstep and grime, in terms of how they’ll be remembered, and how they’re setting themselves up to be remembered, Rupture says:
The subject of a dubstep documentary – any documentary – is ‘dubstep’ itself (the integral objecthood of the docu’s subject); not the content of the scene but only its most obvious, exterior shell, the part of it which has hardened into visibility and no longer moves (maybe the dead part). Once people outside your scene recognize your scene as such, (talking in money terms here) they recognize you as a potential market, something they can invest in or advertise to: you exist.
The hardened shell of the scene? Has it come to this?


Talk to me