The major labels strike an increasingly hysterical line about what’s legal and what’s not in music filesharing.
But it’s happening, and I’m more interested in whether internal controls, like a developing ethics of filesharing, are appearing.
Some things I hear are:
- Won’t trade indie artists
- Buy things afterwards if they like them
- Only give low bitrate files so downloaders have to buy the decent version
- Not linking to leaked albums
- Only overseas stuff
- Only local stuff (promoting locals, who aren’t making money anyway)
I read a thread on M+N promoting a blog called Sure ’nuff ‘n yes I do. The blog’s sole purpose is providing free album downloads from artists like Ash Ra Tempel, Godspeed You! Black Emperor, John Fahey, The Congos and Arvo Pärt. Aside from their good taste in music, I was a bit disturbed by comments like:
I don’t believe in selling music personally, I think it is something that should be shared. Not everyone has hundreds of dollars to spend on CDs. Don’t you think that poor people deserve to hear music too?
That’s nice, but the reality is someone will search for, say Mick Turner’s record, find the blog and download it, instead of going and buying it from whatever online store where it’s actually quite cheap.
And as Emmy posted:
it’s not just audiences who are poor, it’s artists too. An artist like Mick Turner isn’t rolling in cash, you know. He lives in suburban Melbourne with two young children and a partner who is also a musician – it’s not exactly a financially stable lifestyle.
It does feel cheap and mean. With the music by dead people, and the stuff that’s commercially unavailable, I say big ups. But many of those listed are amazing records by people who are still alive, and I think that sort of blog/fileshare situation disrespects the artists it purports to be about.
The alternative, and pretty seductive viewpoint (quoted from forum regular Blake3030) goes like this:
I don’t mind the Dirty Three. I’ve never heard Mick Turner’s solo music. Usually people from bands’ solo work isn’t as good as their bands work. I wouldn’t risk $25 of my money on it when I have a list of about 30 records I do like and want to own that i’m trying to find. However, I would download it for free and if I enjoyed it, I would buy it.
I tend to think that’s too idealistic. I mean could you imagine going into a restaurant, asking for a meal, and then paying if and only if the meal was a taste-bud sensation (and in the real world, most people not even paying for a mind blowing three chef hats 10 course spectacular).
Talk to me